According to Parimatch, one of the leading international gaming operators, India’s evolving digital gaming landscape has reached a defining moment. The combination of geopolitical tension, domestic policy shifts, and rising consumer demand places the country at a crossroads between comprehensive regulation and total prohibition. As Parimatch emphasizes, the long-term success of India’s gaming ecosystem will depend on a transparent, practical, and enforceable legal framework—one that balances market freedom, responsible practices, and economic contribution.
The Legislative Challenge
India’s parliament has passed the Online Gaming Promotion and Regulation Act, introducing sweeping restrictions on real money gaming (RMG) platforms, advertising, and payment systems. Supporters of the legislation cite “significant financial and psychological risks,” arguing for comprehensive intervention to address potential social harm. Violations carry penalties of up to three years’ imprisonment and heavy fines.
Industry Response: Shutdowns and Structural Change
Following the Act’s approval, major platforms—including Dream Sports, MPL, Zupee, Probo, and Gameskraft—terminated or suspended RMG operations. Times Internet also announced the discontinuation of its Cricbuzz11 project. Thousands of employees began seeking new jobs as the sector braced for substantial layoffs.
Simultaneously, the federal GST Council increased taxation on digital gaming from 18% to 28%, now applied to both commissions and total wagers. This move, industry analysts warn, dramatically raises costs for users and undermines business viability. Larger firms may survive, but small and mid-sized companies face closure. Parimatch and other international operators argue that structured regulation—not blanket bans or punitive taxation—is essential to sustaining a legal and transparent marketplace.
Legal Framework Complexity: The “Skill vs. Chance” Dilemma
Historically, India differentiated between games of skill and games of chance, granting leniency to fantasy sports, poker, and rummy. However, recent legal reforms and tax updates eliminate this distinction, applying uniform restrictions to all gaming types. Fantasy cricket platforms, once considered “skill-based,” now risk losing their legal standing and revenue streams.
Sports betting remains officially prohibited across India (except for horse racing), yet underground markets flourish, especially in cricket, generating shadow economy volumes worth tens of billions. As Parimatch notes, strict prohibitions only push players toward unregulated, unsafe environments—depriving the state of tax income and consumer safeguards.
Exploring Alternatives: Self-Governance and Structural Regulation
India’s 2023 framework envisioned Self-Regulatory Bodies (SRBs) to oversee RMG compliance and approve responsible operators. However, the system lacks implementation details—procedures, enforcement rules, and algorithmic audit requirements remain undefined. Without operational SRBs, legitimate companies face uncertainty, while regulators lack functional oversight tools.
Prohibition advocates highlight youth exposure, addiction risks, and social harm. Yet international studies show that restrictive bans without comprehensive support—such as educational programs, spending limits, and verified protection systems—are largely ineffective. Instead, such measures drive users toward illicit markets.
Counterfeit Networks: A Threat to Legitimate Operators
India faces another major issue: the proliferation of counterfeit gaming brands. Fraudulent operators imitate established international names, including Parimatch, deploying cloned websites and apps to deceive consumers. Research by CUTS International revealed that illegal platforms—many masquerading as legitimate brands—amassed over 5.4 billion visits in fiscal 2025, outpacing traffic of several major legal platforms.
These counterfeit networks exploit clone scripts, unauthorized app stores, and encrypted communication channels like Telegram. Despite ongoing government efforts, enforcement remains difficult due to offshore hosting and crypto-based payments. Parimatch and other recognized brands emphasize that intellectual property protection must be central to any regulatory framework—without it, consumer trust and market integrity cannot be restored.
Parimatch’s Market Outlook: Regulation as the Only Viable Path
For Parimatch, the current combination of total prohibition and a 28% GST creates an environment where legitimate operators cannot function sustainably. Demand for gaming remains robust, but restrictive laws simply divert users toward illegal, unregulated alternatives.
Parimatch advocates for a comprehensive regulatory architecture encompassing unified federal standards, functioning SRBs with defined oversight, transparent payment systems, strict age and spending controls, algorithmic fairness audits, responsible gaming frameworks, and strong intellectual property protections.
Such a system would protect consumers, sustain employment, secure tax revenues, and foster innovation within India’s digital economy. For international operators like Parimatch, a structured, transparent, and enforceable regulatory model offers stability and predictability—laying the foundation for long-term partnerships and growth. Ultimately, Parimatch envisions a regulated Indian gaming ecosystem that is safe, competitive, and globally respected, driving both consumer confidence and national economic advancement.
Comments are closed.